All articles
6 min readMaterialsASAABS

ASA or ABS? What Actually Separates Them

ASA and ABS look almost identical on a datasheet. The difference shows up after months of UV, in impact strength and in process stability. A production view.

Green FDM-printed bust on a printer bed, showing real layer detail
Photo: Andrew Barney / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

ASA is chemically close to ABS: the styrene-butadiene phase is replaced by an acrylate rubber. On paper both sit in the same temperature class, around 95 to 100 °C, with similar stiffness and similar machinability. That is why the decision looks arbitrary until the part goes outside.

UV is the whole story

The butadiene phase in ABS contains double bonds that UV light attacks. In practice this means an ABS part outdoors yellows within months, the surface chalks, and impact strength drops long before anything looks broken. ASA has no butadiene phase, so it keeps its colour and its toughness through years of weathering. Every ABS part that failed for a customer of ours in the field failed this way, not mechanically.

Printing behaviour

Both shrink, both warp, both want a heated chamber and a controlled ambient temperature. In our experience ASA is slightly more forgiving on layer adhesion and slightly worse on warping in large flat parts. Neither is a material for an open printer in a cold room, which is a large part of why prints of both fail for hobbyists and succeed in a workshop with enclosed machines.

Cost and availability

ASA filament typically costs somewhat more per kilogram than ABS and comes in fewer colours. On a single small bracket that difference is negligible against setup and post processing. On a batch of a few hundred housings it is worth a calculation, which is the only case where we would suggest ABS for an outdoor part with a short intended service life.

Decision rule

  • Part sees daylight or weather: ASA, without discussion
  • Interior part, heat up to about 95 °C, cost sensitive batch: ABS
  • Needs flame retardancy: neither, use PC FR with a UL94 rating
  • Needs chemical resistance to fuels and oils: neither, use PA12
  • Stays under 70 °C and never goes outside: PETG is cheaper and easier

We print both in enclosed machines and will tell you which one your part needs, including when the cheaper option is fine.

Have the part made

Upload the STEP file, choose a material, calculate price and lead time online.

Calculate online

More articles