Process comparison · Process and manufacturing decisions

FDM or SLS: which process fits the part?

Both processes make functional polymer parts, but their process logic differs. FDM builds extruded roads and needs supports for some geometries. SLS uses a powder bed surrounding parts during the build.

In brief

FDM is often strong for one-offs, large parts or material-specific functional designs. SLS is often strong for complex support-free geometry and dense build packing. The actual quote decides.

Geometry

Shape determines support demand, orientation and finishing.

FDM
Supports on critical overhangs; large parts and targeted internal structure possible
SLS
Powder supports geometry; complex internal and nested forms possible

Properties and surface

Datasheets are comparable only when material, specimen and process are considered.

  • FDM shows pronounced direction dependence from layers and roads.
  • SLS surfaces are typically grainy; FDM shows visible roads and layers.
  • Functional faces may need finishing in either process.

Procurement decision

Compare not only unit price but also samples, change risk and inspection effort.

  • Quote identical CAD data with identical scope.
  • State surface, colour and finishing separately.
  • For production, inspect a representative sample in the target process.

Technical basis

Frequently asked questions

Is SLS always more accurate than FDM?

No. Accuracy in both depends on geometry, material, machine, process control and feature. A universal ranking is not robust.

Which process needs less finishing?

It depends on geometry and target surface. SLS needs depowdering; FDM may need support removal. Functional faces can require machining in either case.

Which process suits cavities?

SLS can build complex cavities but needs access for powder removal. FDM needs access for supports or self-supporting design.

Is FDM cheaper for one-offs?

Often, but not always. Size, build time, material, utilisation and finishing determine price. Comparative quotes must cover the same scope.

Can the same CAD be used unchanged?

It may be manufacturable, but is rarely optimal for both. Supports, wall design, depowdering and orientation lead to different DFM decisions.

Apply the requirement to a real part

Send the CAD file, quantity and service conditions. We review manufacturability, material, orientation and useful inspection features and prepare a quote.